Sequence analysis reveals that this protein is the homologue of cytoplasmic linker protein (CLIP)1C170. are colocalized in the same particulate structures, which resemble vesicles. They are also colocalized at the posterior pole of the early embryo, and this localization is dependent on the actin cytoskeleton. The association of a myosin and a homologue of a microtubule-binding protein in the nervous system and at the posterior pole, where both microtubule and actin-dependent processes are known to be important, leads us to speculate that these two proteins may functionally link the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons. Global organization of the cell and the coordination of its physiology requires interaction between different cytoskeletal systems. During NFATC1 interphase, a typical eukaryotic cell has microtubules emanating from the centrosome located near the nucleus, which extend to the periphery of the cell, presumably interacting with the cortical actin filament meshwork. Microtubules BM-131246 during interphase are thought to be mainly required for the organization of the membrane systems (e.g., vesicular traffic and organelle movement). The actin-rich cortex is important for maintaining cell shape and for cellular movement. There is increasing evidence of coordination between the actin and the microtubule cytoskeletons (Langford, 1995; Koonce, 1996). Data from a number of systems suggests that many cell types use a combination of microtubule and actin filamentCbased transport in vesicle and organelle trafficking. It is well established that microtubules are required for long distance transport of cellular components. In contrast, the actin cytoskeleton is thought to be required for more local traffic. The best evidence for transport along both cytoskeletal systems is in neurons. Vesicles appear to be transported along actin filaments in mammalian growth cones (Evans and Bridgman, 1995). Furthermore, gelsolin, which promotes depolymerization of actin filaments, has been shown to inhibit fast axonal transport in this system (Brady et al., 1984). In extruded squid axoplasm, Kuznetsov et al. (1992) observed what appeared to be the same vesicle moving along microtubules and then, subsequently, along microfilaments. Inhibitor studies provide evidence that mitochondria can move along both actin BM-131246 filaments and microtubules in neurons in vivo (Morris and Hollenbeck, 1995). These data support the idea that actin filament and microtubule-based transport cooperate to achieve proper organization of cellular components. The same phenomenon may be occurring in other cell types. In yeast, the mutant phenotype of the MYO2 gene, BM-131246 which encodes an unconventional myosin, is suppressed by overexpression of a kinesin-related protein. These two proteins are colocalized in regions of active growth where a polarized arrangement of actin plays an important role (Lillie and Brown, 1992, 1994). Microtubules are not normally required for this growth. Thus, the basis for suppression is not completely understood. However, the phenotypic suppression suggests that perhaps microtubule-based transport can substitute for actin filamentCbased transport, under some conditions. In polarized epithelial cells, Fath et al. (1994) have isolated a population of vesicles containing both myosin and microtubule motors. They speculate that proper transport of vesicles relies on both microtubule and actin filamentCbased transport. Previously, it has been shown that a class VI unconventional myosin, the 95F unconventional myosin, transports particles along actin filaments during the syncytial blastoderm stage of embryonic development (Mermall et al., 1994). 95F myosin activity is required for normal embryonic development (Mermall and Miller, 1995). 95F myosin is also associated with particulate structures in other cells of the embryo later in development where it may also be involved in actin-based transport. To investigate further the transport catalyzed by 95F myosin, we have begun.